Where ScyllaDB Outperforms Aerospike at Scale, and Why
If you’re in need of a high performance NoSQL database built for next generation applications there are a few leading candidates. In this comparison we’ll show how ScyllaDB outperforms Aerospike — using Aerospike’s preferred test method.
This paper will provide you with key insights into the following:
- Comparison from the code base on up, and why ScyllaDB’s underlying architecture is fundamentally designed for better scalability and performance
- Differences in data models, query languages, and storage
- How ScyllaDB and Aerospike compare for global deployment, consistency and consensus algorithms
- A head-to-head performance comparison with a petabyte-scale workload, showing how ScyllaDB can provide up to 40% greater throughput on the same scale cluster